Visar inlägg med etikett san remokonferensen. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett san remokonferensen. Visa alla inlägg

tisdag, juni 23, 2020

Vad händer i Israel det närmaste året ?



Dagen när den s k Trumpplanen träder i kraft och
ett stort antal judiska samhällen i Judeen även formellt
införlivas i Israel närmar sig... Det blir första steget till verkliga förhandlingar med arabvärlden.
Israels fiender i EU, svenska regeringen och Svenska Kyrkan m fl (liksom deras allierade i Fatah och Hamas) skummar av raseri och försöker inbilla europeerna att ett Israel med mera stabila gränser skulle på något sätt utgöra ett "hot mot freden i Mellanöstern". Det visar ju egentligen bara hur okunniga och historielösa antisemiterna är...

Den folkrättsliga basen för verklig fred i regionen är nu som tidigare det som beslöts på San Remokonferensen 1920. Men det lär ni inte få höra ett ord om i svenska mediers hatorgier mot Israel...

En läckt rapport från israeliska underrättelsetjänsten analyserar vad som förmodligen kommer att ske de närmaste åren. De galna hundarna i FN, EU, UD m fl kommer att skälla. Det blir kravaller i en del arabstater, men sedan kommer de flesta att anpassa sig till verkligheten.
Och verkligheten är ju bl a att de s k moderata arabstaterna  (t ex Egypten, Saudiarabien, Emiraten, Jordanien) var konsulterade och accepterade Trumpplanen i tysthet. De kommer att gny offentligt, men inser att planen är inkörsporten till verkliga framsteg i regionen...

Försitter man möjligheterna till en stabil överenskommelse även denna gången vrider man klockan femtio år tillbaka.
De måste finna en vettig lösning för hur man enklast avpolleterar bromsklossarna Fatah och Hamas. Men det borde väl arabvärldens "tungviktare" kunna lösa ? Det kanske skulle räcka med att genomföra fria val i "Palestina"? Hur många vill egentligen ha terror, förtryck och elände om de kan erbjudas ett vettigt alternativ ? 

 "A leaked report produced by analysts at Israel’s Ministry of Intelligence urges the government to annex occupied territories in the West Bank as soon as possible, in case Donald Trump loses the upcoming United States presidential elections in November. The report advises the Israeli government that it “should not expect” a widespread outbreak of violence in the streets. It also forecasts that “a wave of diplomatic protests” will gradually give its place to acceptance, as “the international system acclimates itself to annexation”.

The report was leaked to Israel Hayom, a rightwing publication, which is currently Israel’s most widely read newspaper. It discusses the so-called Netanyahu Annexation Plan, which was first unveiled by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on September 10, 2019, just days before Israel’s legislative elections. It proposes the annexation by Israel of several Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories, which are viewed as illegal by the United Nations. The plan has been condemned by the United Nations and many Western countries, but has the approval of the White House.


Palestinian groups and several Arab countries have warned Israel that there will be serious consequences if it proceeds with the proposed annexation. But the Intelligence Ministry report, authored at the request of the Intelligence Services Minister Eli Cohen, claims that these warnings should not worry the Israeli government. A possible annexation of the Israeli settlements will cause some demonstrations throughout the Arab World, it says, but it won’t substantially “rouse the Arab street” against Arab governments. This, it claims, “will make it clear to Arab leaders that the Palestinian issue is not a threat” to their political survival.

The report goes further, suggesting that an aggressive move by Israel may bring Arab governments closer to it, once Arab leaders realize that the annexation of Palestinian lands by the Jewish state will not prompt major reactions among their citizens. Additionally, it suggests that the timing for the annexation works in Israel’s favor, as the Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank, has been substantially weakened by its disagreement with the White House. Additionally, it says, Hamas “lacks appetite for another round of fighting” and most Palestinians are “mostly concerned with the troubles of day-to-day-life”. Other countries are mostly preoccupied with the coronavirus pandemic, and the Arab public outside Palestine has “more pressing concerns at home”, the report opines.


In its concluding section, the report appears to dismiss the conventional thinking that the annexation of the settlements will destroy even the remotest possibility of a peace settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. It report argues that “after a period in which the international system acclimates itself to the annexation”, the Palestinians and their supporters in the region will be compelled “to return to peace talks”, and even seek “solutions and arrangements that aren’t affixed to the 1967 lines and primarily territorial aspects”. In its concluding section, the report suggests that the Israeli government would have more to gain by proceeding with the annexation as soon as possible, rather than waiting, because it is “impossible to know how the US presidential election in November will unfold”.

Rapporten är hämtad från intelnews.org 
  

lördag, oktober 02, 2010

Ännu en gång: De "ockuperade territorierna" är en myt

På den alltid läsvärda Doc´s Talk finns en
snåriga folkrätten omkring internationella
konventioner. Där analyseras bl a Judéens,
Samariens och Gazas folkrättsliga status.
Den slutsats författaren drar är att det
fortfarande är San Remokonferensens
resolution från 25 april 1920 som reglerar
områdets status och bl a judarnas rätt att
bosätta sig där. Alla senare dokument, t ex
FN-resolutioner, är av icke-bindande
karaktär.
***
On the contrary, the only existing enforceable
document actually encourages Jewish settlement.
This document was created on April 24, 1920 at
the San Remo Conference when the Principal
Allied Powers agreed o assign the Mandate for
the territory of Palestine to Great Britain.
By doing so the League of Nations "recognized
the historical connection of the Jewish people
with Palestine" and established "grounds for
econstituting their national home in that country."
Article 6 of the Mandate "encouraged close
settlement by Jews on the land," including the
lands of Judea, Samaria and Gaza (Yesha).
There is nothing whatsoever in the Mandate
that separates Yesha from the rest of the
mandated territory. That means that the right
of the Jews to settle the land spreads to the
whole of Palestine. As a side note it is worth
mentioning that the 76% of the territory of
Mandated Palestine known today as Jordan,
were not permanently exempt from settlement
by the Jews either. Article 25 only allowed to
"postpone or withhold application of [this]
provision."
***