Richard Jomshof: Vi har varit för slappa mot islam

 

Nyhetsbyrån NB bjuder på en intervju med Richard Jomshof.

 Richard Jomshof (SD) är partisekreterare och skolpolitisk talesperson. Han vill se statligt huvudmannaskap av skolan och en tydlig ledning med rektorer som vågar ta tag i problem. Skolan har otydliga regelverk och många vågar inte gripa in. Den väldiga invandringen har påverkat skolan negativt – och det som länge varit en ”flumskolan” har nu förvärrats.

Skall man hålla ihop Sverige är islamismen ett huvudbekymmer. Kristendomen är det sammanhållande kittet i vårt samhälle – även om man inte är troende. Vi har också haft ”upplysningstiden” på 1700-talet, vilken aldrig har ägt rum i den muslimska världen. Det är klart att moskéer som finansieras av ”skurkstater” som Saudiarabien är ett problem. De bör stängas och ”monteras ned”.

Visst finns det sekulära och liberala muslimer, men de är tyvärr inte tongivande. Vi måste få kritisera religioner precis som politiska partier, menar Richard Jomshof. Han avser själv att fortsätta med sin kritik så länge inte islam och koranen reformeras. Och han vill tillåta kritik mot islam utan att det får konsekvenser. ”Den dag vi sitter i regering skall vi se till att vi får ett öppet demokratiskt samhälle”, lovar han.

Christopher Jarnvall

 

Ur huvudet på en terrorist: Tarrants manifest

Antalet offer för gårdagens terrordåd på Nya Zealand

torde nu överstiga 50. Gärningsmannen greps på platsen.

Men nu ställer sig ju alla frågan VARFÖR ?

Brenton Tarrant publicerade samtidigt med dådet ett 74-

sidigt manifest, som berättade om hans motiv.

Det fanns snabbt spritt över hela nätet, men börjar

redan försvinna från den ena länken efter den andra...

På nedanstående länk från Singapore fanns den

fortfarande vid midnatt.

Men vill ni hinna läsa den så spara den

själv på din dator...
(se även nederst i artikeln)

 The Great Replacement

berättar om hur en ung australisk arbetarklass-

pojke utvecklas från kommunist till "ethno-

nationalist" och fascist.

Hans två ideal idag är Sir Oswald Mosley

(brittisk fascistledare under mellankrigstiden)

och regimen i Kommunist-Kina...

Han beskriver sig själv så här:

Sedan han tjänat lite pengar på spekulationer

i Bitcoin reste han runt i Europa ett par år.

Särskilt tycks han ha studerat kampen mellan islam

och den kristna kulturen på Balkan.

De två händelser som  han såg som utlösande

för sin "kamp" mot islam var terrordådet på

Drottninggatan i Stockholm och Frankrikes

politiska sammanbrott då Macron vann

presidentvalet...

Särskilt framhåller han terrormordet på lilla

Ebba Åkerlund som den omstörtande händelse
som drev honom till terrordådet.

("That difference was Ebba Åkerlund")

*****

Brödraskapets reaktion

Den statliga turkiska TV-kanalen TRT World,

propagandaorgan för president Erdogan

och Muslimska Brödraskapet "analyserar" manifestet.

***

American Conservative kritiserar manifestet.

****

Manifestet som .ZIP-fil.

(OBS Från en dubiös källa....)

****

Och här fanns manifestet fortfarande för
nedladdning i natt....

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/the-great-replacement-pdf.695022/

Och Ramadan rullar på....

Årets Ramadan, den muslimska festmånaden, pågår

för fullt sedan den 17 maj.

Den förträffliga bloggen Religion of Peace för som

vanligt statistik över dess konsekvenser, dag för dag:

Apropå ovanstående siffror: En muslim har

mördats av hinduiska extremister i Indien.

Något som inte händer varje år.

I övrigt är det som alltid "fredens religion"

islam som producerar offer i stora mängder. 

Polisen konstaterar som vanligt att fastandet

leder till lågt blodsocker hos muhammedanerna,

vilket leder till ökad retlighet och våldsbenägenhet.

Samtidigt hetsar salafistiska imamer upp sina

anhängare ( t ex shariagängen) till mera våld...

Antalet knivhuggningar, skjutningar och grupp-

våldtäkter tycks öka i våra storstäder under

denna månad...

Kollegan Petterssons blogg frågade redan

för fem år sedan:

Idag börjar den heliga fastemånaden ramadan.

Den ska hjälpa muslimerna att leva rättfärdigt

och göra goda gärningar. Alla förväntas
uppträda väl, ge allmosor, högakta sin
familj och undvika våld.

Ramadan ger också muslimerna tid att tänka över varför

de är inblandade i 90 % av de väpnade konflikterna
på vår jord.

De får möjlighet att fundera varför muslimer är osams med judar,

kristna, hinduer, buddister, ateister samt inte minst andra sorters

muslimer.

Muslimerna kan också fundera på varför de slåss i Ryssland, Kina,

Thailand, Indien, Burma, Nigeria och på mängder av andra platser

ända bortifrån Filippinerna och till Gibraltar.

Det ger muslimer möjlighet att tänka på sina fyra miljoner bröder

som svälter i Syrien eftersom islamister förstör odlingar och

kidnappar hjälparbetare. Varför islamister spränger moskéer
i luften tillsammans med oskyldiga människor i Afghanistan och

Irak, varför de har rivit 150 kristna kyrkor i Europa de senaste

fem åren.

De kan fundera på om det var meningen att de länder islam
erövrat skulle vara världens sämsta att bo i.

När de funderat på det, kan tänka på om den ideologi som kallas

islam är bra eller om det är lika bra att lägga ned skiten?

****

Bra kommentar av Mohamed Omar

TERROR I MÅNADEN RAMADAN.

Ny-stalinismens tid

 

 



Norska Human Rights Service förskräcks över att en svensk pensionär riskerar fängelse för att ha kritiserat ideologin islam.
(Mera om HRS och Hege Storhaug)

Pensionären Denny Abrahamsson säger själv som kommentar:
 – För några år sedan tyckte jag också att islam är väl bara en vanlig religion, men sedan läste jag Koranen och blev chockad av det hatet som finns där, kvinnoföraktet, hat mot otrogna. Ju mer islam tar över, ju mer kompromissar vi. Islam är ju en totalitär ideologi, det för med sig diktatur. Så jag menar att vårt demokratiska system är i fara.

Läs gärna polisens tragikomiska förundersökning och åklagarens d:o stämningsansökan. Rättegång i Stockholms Tingsrätt 19 juni.

Polisanmälan mot pensionären tycks härröra från en av de Stasiliknande grupper som opererar i dagens Sverige. AFA, Expo, Researchgruppen och allt vad de heter...

Stasi tycks tyvärr vara idealet för "rättskipningen" på fler håll i världen.
Israeliska Arutz Sheva skriver med anledning av att EU-byråkraterna försöker stoppa Polens försök till upprensning i den kommunistiska sump som fortfarande styr alltför mycket av landets rättsväsen:

Judges have real and huge power. Unlike heads of states and parliamentarians, they are not elected by anyone, which provides a solid ground for manipulation. Poland, which decided to limit judicial power, is being punished by the EU.

Courts have been turned into leverage for destruction of national democracies by the totalitarian system

In late December, the European Commission announced punitive measures against Poland using the so-called “nuclear option”, Article 7 of the Lisbon Treaty. The reason was the decision of Warsaw to limit the power of judges. The EU considered this an infringement on "freedom, democracy and the rule of law".

In fact, the "nuclear option" of the EU has no relation to freedom, democracy, or the rule of law. Its goal is to establish a totalitarian supranational system in Poland, the leading country of the Visegrad Fronde, in order to supersede democratic national institutions of power.

The judicial system in a democratic state should guard rights of citizens. Together with the executive and legislative powers, it must guarantee "the enjoyment of life and liberty" of free citizens (The Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776), or according to Jeremy Bentham, the founder of British utilitarianism, ensure "the greatest happiness of the greatest number".

The problem is that judges have real and huge power. However unlike heads of states, governments and parliamentarians, they are not elected by anyone, which provides a solid ground for manipulation.

Today, the judicial system has turned into a disgusting parody of itself; supported by politicians, Academia, media and NGOs, it is now a powerful lever used by prominent people to promote the ideology of political correctness and multiculturalism.

The goal of this ideology is ethnic and cultural substitution and, as a consequence, Islamization. It is not actively displayed, although it is not concealed.

In 2001, the former French Interior Minister Jean-Pierre Chevenement called for integration of 75 million migrants from Africa and Asia within 50 years.

In July 2008, the Chief Justice of England and Wales Lord Phillips declared that it was inevitable to recognize Sharia courts in Great Britain.

In September 2015, at the peak of the crisis with migrants, the journalist Ralf Schuler ("Bild") reported the EU was planning to receive additional 5 million refugees from Asia and Africa.

In September 2017, the EU financed the exhibition in Brussels called "Islam, It's Also Our History!". According to Isabelle Benoit, a historian from the Tempora organization, “We want to make it clear to Europeans that Islam is a part of our civilization”.

On February 22, President of France Emmanuel Macron said: “French culture does not exist. There is a culture in France and it is diverse… French art? I have never seen it!”.

 

According to Finance Minister of Germany Wolfgang Schäuble, Germans need to learn humanistic values of Islam, and Islam is “a constituent part of Germany”.

This aim is realized in three stages.

Stage one - corruption of society, impo‎sition of barbarous archaic customs, destruction of the national culture, eradication of Judeo-Christian values.

Stage two - support of Islamic occupation and migrant violence, legalization of the Sharia.

Stage three - suppression of dissent at all levels.

It is obvious that a healthy and cohesive society would resist turning it into slavery. Therefore it is necessary to undermine its foundations, to swap values: virtue should be presented as evil, barbarity - as cultural originality, abnormality - as the norm. Courts are the main leverage in this game. Below are some of the examples of this phenomenon.

In February 2007, a German court released the former member of The Red Army Faction (RAF) Brigitte Mohnhaupt, who had murdered 9 people in 1970s. She didn’t express any regret for her crimes.
In July 2017, The National Health Service (NHS) reported 5391 cases of female genital mutilations. Although this disgusting procedure was banned in the UK in 1985, not a single person was convicted.

This is only a marginal part of thousands of similar verdicts, which under the guise of humanism and human rights impose chaos and all kinds of perversions.

On the other hand, Christian values are also being consistently destroyed.

When the foundation of the society is undermined, the second stage of destruction begins.
In the Rule of Law, laws should be applied to all citizens - otherwise the very idea of democracy and justice loses its meaning.



 

Today, parallel Sharia law legally operates in Western Europe. The so called Laws of the Jungle reign in "black holes" of "no-go-zones", and courts condone lawlessness and savagery.

During the period of 1999 to 2001, two teenage girls from Fontenay-sous-Bois (outside Paris) were gang-raped by 14 Muslim teenagers. Ten of the rapists were acquitted, two persons were sentenced to only one year in prison, one person was sentenced to six months in prison, and the last one out of 14 was charged with a suspended sentence.
In January 2006, a French Jew, Ilan Halimi, was kidnapped by a gang calling themselves "Barbarians,” headed by Yusuf Fofana. They tortured him, doused with gasoline and burned alive. 24 members of the gang were sentenced to terms between 6 months to 18 years only. Two "Barbarians" were freed.
In May 2016, at the school of Lund (Sweden) a Muslim migrant teen raped a 14-year-old girl. The girl was transferred, but the rapist remained at the same school. He was only punished with 100 hours of detention.
In October 2016, the Gothenburg District Court sentenced a migrant Abdul to 10 months of youth care (only!) for raping of a 14-year-old girl, but Supreme Court of Western Sweden abrogated Abdul because he suffered from ADHD syndrome and "didn’t understand no”.
In July 2017, Malmö District Court sentenced a 19-year-old Afghan Muslim migrant to one month in prison for raping of a 13-year-old boy. And so on.

According to official statistics, only every fifth migrant rapist in Sweden (and only 13 percent of migrant pedophiles) are deported to their home countries - Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia or Iraq.

This is not characteristic of Sweden in particularly. In December 2016 in Vienna, 20-year-old Amir from Iraq raped a 10-year-old boy in a toilet of a swimming pool. The District Court sentenced him to six years, but the Austrian Supreme Court overturned it "for lack of evidence."
Pakistani members of Rochdale child sex abuse ring (with the exception of their leader Shabir Ahmed) were sentenced to ridiculous terms from 4 to 9 years.

 

In 2014, a 40-year-old preacher Suleman Maknojioa was accused of harassing an 11-year-old girl. He was sentenced to 40 weeks' imprisonment only, but did not stay in prison a single day as he was the only breadwinner.
In Germany in January 2017, a 47-year-old Syrian migrant was sentenced to one year and 9 months of imprisonment only for raping a mentally disabled woman – “because when he is drunk, he is unpredictable”. By that time he committed 23 various offenses, including assault, robbery and fare evasion.

There are hundreds of similar examples…
In June this year, three underage Muslim migrants severely raped a 5-year-old girl in Idaho. In the court room their lawyers advocated that the so called “boys” were decent and trustworthy and they suffered from Post Traumatic Stress (PTSD).
In April 2012, for the sake of "Freedom of ex‎pression" the Spanish Supreme Court freed 9 Islamists who were planning terrorist attacks in the name of "liberation of Spain".

The Western legal system openly sabotages decisions of the executive and legislative branches of power.
The best evidence of this is courts blocking Trump’s ban on the reception of migrants from Middle East. This has nothing to do with humanism, since those who need help most of all, are deprived of it. It’s not only about Christians and Yazidis.

In Israel, the High Court of Justice deliberately replaces the executive branch: it prevents destruction of houses of terrorists and deportation of terrorists, cooperates with left NGO to demolish Jewish houses, and blocks deportation of illegal African migrants to third countries.

EU laws literally ensure safety for terrorists. Imam Abdelbaki Es Satty, who organized a terrorist attack in Barcelona, was brought to trial on drug business charges in 2014, but Judge Pablo de la Rubia dismissed his deportation, as it was deemed a violation of EU laws.

In August 2012, two Al-Qaeda terrorists, one of whom plotted to kill thousands of people in a bomb attack in a British shopping center, applied to the European Court of Human Rights against MI5. Officials at the European Court allowed their application to go ahead.
The European Court of Human Rights and the British Court of Appeal didn’t deport Abu Qatad, Palestinian Al-Qaeda activist, to the Hashemite Kingdom for 10 years because of “humanitarian considerations.”

The third stage is elimination of dissenters of any age and social status.

Stalin asserted that repression should be based on laws, and indeed Stalin’s terror was based on the progressive Stalinist Constitution of 1936. The legislation of Western countries, which is quite liberal, opens limitless possibilities for justice.

The French pioneered the path to Muslim colonization. The starting point on the way to ethnic and cultural substitution, according to Eric Zemmur, was the Pleven law on racism (1972), which was then supplemented with even more radical laws.

Germany went even further by deciding to set censorship - fines of up to $56,000,000 for "hate speech" in order to protect freedom of speech, according ex-Justice Minister Heiko Maas.

The last major and successful case was the deprivation of the parliamentary immunity of Marin Le Pen by the French prosecutor's office after she published images of ISIS atrocities in Twitter.

The Swedish prosecutor's office accused Peter Springare, a police officer from Orebro, of spreading hatred and racism. All he did was listing police reports compiled in one week and naming criminals and countries of their origin.
Aboriginals are defenseless in the face of their colonial barbarians, because the judicial system sides with the latter always and everywhere.

A mere suspicion of Islamophobia can cause fatal consequences.
In 2016, 35-year-old Kevin Crehan made a joke by leaving a half-eaten sandwich with bacon on the doorstep of a mosque in Bristol. He was accused of racist attack, sentenced to one year in prison and died there under strange circumstances.

Any doubt on the purity of Islam is ruthlessly punished. In August 2017, the German journalist Michael Stürzenberger was sentenced to a half-year in prison after posting of a photo on Facebook where a ranking Nazi was shaking hands with Amin al-Husseini - the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.
No totalitarian system is ready to tolerate heretics within its realm. That’s why it hates Trump so much. That’s why it strives to undermine Israel, defames Victor Orban and seeks to bring Poland to its knees – because of its striving for sovereignty and national democracy.

***

 

PS Har ni inte läst Hege Storhaugs Landsplågan Islam,

GÖR DET !

 

Daniel Pipes: Merkel's historic folly

 

Gårdagens jihad i Marseille 

 

Daniel Pipes var en av de första forskare som varnade Västerlandet för den expanderande islamismen.
Hans artiklar har fungerat som lärorika varningsklockor för de politiker och journalister, som är mottagliga för fakta. 
Inför tyska valet häromveckan skrev han en uppmärksammad artikel om Angela Merkels stora misstag. Den har publicerats över hela världen, inte minst i Tyskland....
Jag har hämtat ett utdrag från israeliska Arutz Sheva.
 

Mr. Pipes, You have written that Angela Merkel's decision to open the border to over a million migrants in 2015 "will likely be seen as a turning point in European history." You are a historian, so, what do you mean by this expression?                                                                                                                             I expect that when the evolution of European civilization is studied in the future, August 2015 will be seen as a key moment. The decision to allow unlimited immigration into Germany has had profound implications for Europe by raising this issue in a more acute way than ever before, creating divisions both among native Europeans who are for and against large-scale immigration and between native and new Europeans.

What basic questions do Europeans face?
Lacking sufficient children, the question is whether Europeans will they continue passively to accept whomever turns up, even if they lack skills and come from a largely hostile culture or whether they will develop a plan of controlled immigration, selecting people around the world most suited to bring skills and fit in? Germany's decision to open the borders meant choosing the former option.

Why are relations between Europeans and Muslim immigrants so fraught with tension?
They are fraught because Islam is an imperialist faith and many Muslim immigrants want to replace existing European civilization with Islam. Exacerbating matters, Europeans and Muslims are opposites on several key issues: Europeans have a low birthrate, Muslim immigrants have a high one. Europeans have a weak religious identity, Muslims have a strong one. Europeans feel guilty for their historical sins; immigrants have boisterous confidence in the superiority of their civilization.

 

Many Germans argue that as a rich nation, they morally must open their doors to people in need.
I admire that humanitarian impulse but it is unrealistic. Can Germany take in, say, 2 billion people? If not, how does it morally pick the tiny percentage it does allow in?

Is it not strange that migrants from Syria and Iraq move to places like Germany and Sweden? They would be better off going to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, where the climate, the language, the religion, and the mores are all like their own; plus, these countries are much closer to Syria.

What, then, is the answer?
Practically speaking, see the world in terms of cultural and geographic zones: Westerners in need should stay in the West, Middle Easterners should stay in the Middle East, and so forth around the globe. Is it not strange that migrants from Syria and Iraq move to places like Germany and Sweden? They would be better off going to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, where the climate, the language, the religion, and the mores are all like their own; plus, these countries are much closer to Syria

Cultures and customs change. Perhaps Muslims will adapt to European cultures if given the opportunity?
In theory, yes; in practice, no. Experience shows that the first generation of Muslim immigrants to Europe is more adaptable than its children and grandchildren, as cultural separation increases over time. It is hard to find any place in Europe where Muslim immigrants have assimilated, leading me gravely to doubt that this will take place in the future. Chileans, Chinese, and Congolese fit better into European culture than do Muslims.

Many Muslims of immigrant origins point to discrimination as a factor hindering them from fully integrating into German society.
Yes, discrimination is a problem. I would not want to be named Muhammad and look for a job in Hamburg. But that supports my argument that it is better to be named Muhammad in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait. Why push together peoples who, as the last 55 years have shown, cannot live easily together? As Thilo Sarrazin has showed, the experiment of Muslim immigration has failed; continuing it will increase tensions.

 

You stress that Islamism, not Islam, is the threat. How do you define Islamism?
Islamism is a specific understanding of Islam that holds if Muslims wish to return to the riches and power of 1,000 years ago, they must apply the Islamic law in its entirety. Islamists argue among themselves how to do so: the modern-oriented Gülen movement in Turkey represents one extreme and ISIS, which wants to return to the seventh century, represents the other. Some Islamists use violence, others work through the political system. In this way, they resemble communists, with their major tactical differences but similar goals

You describe "the Islamist threat" as "arguably the most consequential issue of our time" facing the West. Islamist terror can certainly do damage but how can Islamists threaten the West as a whole, given the West's dominant economic and military power?
I see Islamism as the third great totalitarian threat after communism and fascism, a seductive and powerful body of ideas that threatens our way of life. And just as we had to fight against the fascism and communism, we now must fight Islamism.

When you say that the West needs to fight Islamism, what kind of fight are you thinking of - cultural, political, or military?
Fighting violence is the easy part because murderous jihadi attacks are frightening and the West has police departments, intelligence agencies and armed forces competent to deal with this problem. Further, this low-level violence destroys property and kills people but cannot shift civilizations. Lawful Islamists, in contrast, by working within the system, in the political, educational, philanthropic, or media arenas, have a potentially profound influence. While I'd rather encounter a lawful Islamist rather than a violent jihadi on the street, only non-violent tactics change the face of society; and relatively few Westerners even notice what's happening.

How do you view Europe's response to Islamism?

Compared to 20 years ago, a great leap in awareness has occurred – but not enough yet to make a difference in policy. Virtually everywhere in Europe, political parties exist that make immigration and Islamism a priority, but almost none of them has been in power because these groups tend to be staffed by amateurs, contain too many extremists, and are ostracized. As a result, they cannot reach 51 percent.

 

Like the Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, the only party that consistently opposes Muslim immigration?
Precisely. The AfD is an excellent example of amateurs mixed with extremists trying to figure out who they are – liberals, Neo-Nazis, or something in between? As long as they leave this question open, their electoral potential is limited, and they are dangerous. But I expect that eventually the AfD will mature, and I think and hope it will move toward the mainstream for there clearly exists a need for such a party in Germany. But every year that goes by, the danger grows.

Will the anti-immigration remain excluded from power?
No, I expect this will change, that these parties will start to gain power within a decade.

The AfD stands below 10 percent in the polls while Merkel's CDU gets almost 40 percent. Does this signal that Germans are not that unhappy with Merkel's immigration policies?
I am surprised by and cannot explain the lack of a CDU challenge to Merkel.

Geert Wilders of the Netherlands, one of the most prominent politicians against Muslim immigration, has been put on trial for hate speech. Your organization helped cover his legal costs; why?
We at the Middle East Forum believe in the freedom publicly to state opinions on matters concerning Islam and Islamism, whether or not we happen to agree with that opinion. Toward this end, our Legal Project often helps defendants pay legal costs, including Wilders' a few years ago. I disagree with his views on who the enemy is (he says Islam, I say Islamism) but that is secondary; I will help him, as any Westerner, assert the right to talk about Islam without getting hauled into Court.

Is Donald Trump's "Muslim ban" a useful way to keep Islamists out of the United States?
The Trump administration's ban of the citizens of six majority-Muslim countries was well-intentioned but poorly executed. One should not look at a person's passport but at his ideas. Some Canadians are our enemies and some Iranians are our friends. Of course, ideas are more elusive than nationality. But banning certain nationalities does not offer protection; that requires a serious effort to know each person entering the country.

The city of Hamburg in 2012 signed an accord, a "Staatsvertrag" with Muslim groups such as Ditib, Schura, and VIKZ to regulate Islamic classes and holidays. Members of those organization have been accused of Islamism and antisemitism, yet the authorities cannot a find clean Muslim organization. Your comment?
Islamists are much better funded and organized than non-Islamist Muslims, in part because they receive help from Middle Eastern states such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey. This permits them routinely to dominate Muslim life in the West, appearing on television, engaging in interreligious dialogue, teaching in classrooms, and (as in this case) partnering with governments.

You want Western governments to empower moderate Muslims but in Germany, only a few Muslims have showed up to protest Islamism, so who and where are the moderates?
Calls for mass Muslim support against Islamism always fail in the West. (Muslim-majority countries are another matter.) In part this results from a lack of funding and organization, in part to intimidation: it takes an awful lot of courage to be a Muslim and to come out publicly against Islamism. The new liberal Ibn Ruschd-Goethe mosque in Berlin is a good example: its founder, Seyran Ateş, has received death threats.

What should Western governments do?
Strongly support non-Islamist Muslims - and especially anti-Islamist Muslims. Islamists like Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan claim there is only one kind of Islam, namely theirs. No: there are many versions of Islam and non-Muslims should reject, and certainly not enable, Islamist hegemony. Rather, brave anti-Islamists like Ateş should get official recognition and other forms of support.

 

 

 

Prof. Daniel Pipes

Daniel Pipes is president and founder of the Middle East Forum and has authored 12 books., He is considered one of the world’s foremost analysts on the Middle East and Muslim history. He warned of militant Islam's war with the USA years before 9.11 and called Arafat's bluff at Oslo.



När islam stoppades vid Wien 1683

 

Att fira stora slag och segrar är definitivt ute i dagens

Europa. Det är bara Frankrike som envist fortsätter med

militärparader på sin Nationaldag. Något motsvarande

i Sverige skulle ju dels framstå som ren lyteskomik

med tanke på Försvarets tillstånd, dels fått allvarlig

politisk kritik från stalinisterna på DN:s kultursida...

 

Därför värmde det ju en gammal soldats hjärta när

jag nyligen blev vittne till hur Wiens ungdom

högtidlighöll slaget vid Kahlenberg 1683, förra

gången islams invasionsförsök slogs tillbaka av

en förenad europeisk här under ledning av den

polske kungen Jan Sobieski.
Det blev det sista i en lång rad av europeiska
försvarskrig mot den framryckande jihadismen 
som startade med slaget vid Poitiers 732.

En liten reklamfilm på nätet samlade ett tusental
ungdomar på Kahlenberg i Wiens utkanter till
fackeltåg och minnestal. Österrikarna (inte minst
de unga) känner sig hårt trängda av den nya
islamistiska invasionen. Visserligen mera en
demografisk än en väpnad invasion, men på
sikt med samma resultat.

 

Slaget vid Wien (eller slaget vid Kahlenberg) var det slag som följde på belägringen av staden Wien som genomfördes av det Osmanska riket mellan maj och september 1683. Det är inte att förväxla med belägringen av Wien 1529.

I syfte att slutgiltigt besegra den österrikiske kejsaren utrustade den osmanske sultanen Mehmet IV i början av 1680-talet en armé på runt 200 000 man (förutom turkiska styrkor även kontingenter från vasallerna Bosnien, Ungern, Serbien, Albanien, Grekland och Krim). Sultanen satsade allt på ett kort och beslöt att försöka ta Wien. Krig förklarades i augusti 1682 och i början av april året därpå marscherade en här på 150 000 man under den albanske storvesiren Kara Mustafa nordvästut mot Wien.
Den flera månader långa belägringen inleddes på försommaren 1683. Wien sände ut desperata böner om hjälp och höll ut tillräckligt länge för att en polsk-tysk armé om 70 000 man under den polske kungen Johan III Sobieskis ledning kunde sättas upp och komma Österrike till undsättning. Den 10-11 september 1683 arrangerade Sobieski forcerat och mödosamt undsättningshären till strid över de kringliggande skogklädda bergen. Den 12 september stod den allierade undsättningskåren färdig till strid på fälten mellan Kahlenberg och det belägrade Wien. Efter en hel dags infanteri- och artilleristrider satte Sobieski in den ditintills största kavallerichocken i Europas historia; 20 000 ryttare anförda av en spjutspets på 3 000 lansbeväpnade polska bevingade husarer klöv och skingrade den osmanska hären som hävde belägringen och flydde i panik.
I det fortsatta kriget förlorade osmanerna allt mer mark. Kara Mustafa tvingades som straff för sitt misslyckande av sultanen att traditionsenligt ta sitt liv genom strypning juldagen samma år. I freden i Karlowitz 1699 fick sultanen överlämna Ungern, Transsylvanien och Slavonien till Österrike.

                       

 Men vad utspelades då på Kahlenberg
i september 1683 ?

Den polsk-italienska filmen 11 wrzesnia 1683, Bitwa pod Wiedniem/
The day of the Siege: September Eleven 1683 skildrar slagets förlopp.

Det är väl ingen överdrift att påstå  att Europas seger över
Ottomanernas jihad kom att bestämma den politiska
utvecklingen i vår världsdel för flera hundra år framåt.
Först i våra dagar har islamismen återigen blivit
ett reellt hot mot Europa.

 

För den nyfikne:
Den vältalande munken är påvens personliga sändebud

Marco d'Aviano, som gjorde en viktig insats för att

ena de europeiska styrkorna och ingjuta mod i

soldaterna. d'Aviano saligförklarades av påve

Johannes Paulus II

 

I Wien fick han en staty:

 

 

Hela filmen finns här, tyvärr endast i en dålig piratkopia...

 

 

Avhoppad jihadist varnar för islam

 

 

Morten Storm är internationellt känd som

avhoppad jihadist, som sedan han insett

islams ondska hoppade av Al Qaeda och

blev agent åt PET (danska säkerhetspolisen)

och CIA och bl a  hjälpte dem likvidera

hatpredikanten och terroristledaren al-Awlaqi

i Jemen.

 

För en månad sedan talade han vid Folkefesten

For Frihed i Danmark. Det är ett intressant

föredrag om livet som jihadist i Somalia

och Jemen. Storms bakgrund är mc-gänget

Bandidos, som besegrades av shariagängen

och islamiserades.

 

Idag bor han återigen i Danmark och har vigt

sitt liv åt att upplysa om och bekämpa islam.

Bl a genom boken Agent Storm: A Spy inside

Al Qaeda, som finns på bl a danska, engelska,

tyska, franska och polska.

 

Se också denna intervju med CBN News där han

talar om jihadismen i Al Qaeda och Kalifatet.

Jag har själv haft tillfälle träffa och samtala med Storm

några gånger. Det centrala i hans budskap idag är

att jihadismen inte är något slags "extrem" eller

"urspårad" islam (som t ex Obama försökte inbilla

oss...) utan snarare islams kärna. Den muslim

som följer den onde profetens ordagranna påbud

(d v s salafism) hamnar oundvikligen i den

soppa av hat, antisemitism och mord som utgör

Kalifatets näringslösning....  

  

Ramadanterrorn - även i år

 



Det är Ramadan igen - har ni märkt det ?

Enligt polisen märks det bl a genom att muhammedanerna

på grund av lågt blodsocker genom fastan är mera retliga och

oftare är inblandade i allsköns bråk... 

 

Tyvärr märks det också genom att antalet terrordåd

ökar kraftigt.

 

Redan inför ramadans start 26 maj mördade islamisterna

som bekant 29 kopter utanför Kairo.

 

Vad vi inte fick veta genom gammelpressen var att de

kristna skolbarnen på väg till ett kloster tvingades

av sin buss och ställdes inför det i arabvärlden

klassiska valet för kristna:
 

KONVERTERA ELLER DÖ !

Alla valde att hålla fast vid sin tro

(f ö liksom de 21 koptiska martyrerna i Libyen 2015).

 

Hemsidan Religion of Peace har även i år ett speciellt

Ramadan Bombathon där antalet mördade noteras för varje dag:

 

Igår var läget följande

 

 

 

Men i morse mördade talibanerna minst

49 personer med en bilbomb i Kabul...
(NU är antalet uppe 80 döda och 350 skadade)

 

Så siffrorna lär tyvärr öka kraftigt för varje dag.

Värt att notera:

Sedan 11 september 2001 har "fredens religion"

mördat minst 30.920 människor ! 

 

 

Läs också Mohamed Omars utmärkta artikel

TERROR I MÅNADEN RAMADAN 

 

 

SPRID GÄRNA !