När jag startade bloggen i maj 2005
var en av de bästa och mest väl-
skrivande kollegorna norske Fjordman.
Hans lärorika och välformulerade inlägg
blev senare bearbetade och samlade till
blev senare bearbetade och samlade till
boken Defeating Eurabia (kan laddas
ned kostnadsfritt här).
Därför kände jag stor saknad när han
meddelade att han tänkte upphöra
med sin blogg till nyår 2005.
Men naturligtvis också en viss stolt-
het över att Jihad i Malmö var en
av de bloggar Fjordman rekommen-
derade sina läsare att gå över till:
"Of blogs in Scandinavian languages, I like
Danske øjne på svenske forhold is invaluable
Dick Erixon should be mentioned."
**
Nu visade det sig att Fjordman snart
återkom som flitig och populär gäst-
bloggare på bl a Gates of Vienna, Tundra
Så sommaren 2011 rasade helvetet över
honom. Utpekad i gammelpressen som
honom. Utpekad i gammelpressen som
något slags andlig inspiratör till galningen
Breivik sattes det skottpengar på honom
och han tvingades under en period t o m
i landsflykt.
i landsflykt.
Nu är han tillbaka i bloggosfären, fort-
farande som gästbloggare och fort-
farande lika välskrivande och stridbar.
farande lika välskrivande och stridbar.
**
Nyligen försökte Breiviks försvarare tvinga
honom att ställa upp som expertvittne i
den famösa rättegången. Fjordman vägrade,
men publicerar idag en lång artikel med det
han skulle sagt inför rätten.
Nu finns den här, både på norska och
engelska.
Ett kort utdrag:
"Is it true that Breivik’s world view is common
among anti-Islamists?
Several so-called expert witnesses, including Terje
Emberland, Mattias Gardell, Lars Gule and Øyvind
Strømmen, have suggested that Breivik’s world
view is quite common among anti-Islamists and
Islam critics. This is utter nonsense.
However, it is legitimate to point out that for
instance Gardell has openly cooperated with
representatives from the Islamic Jihadist terrorist
organization Hamas, and that Anders Behring
Breivik has repeatedly expressed his great
admiration for Islamic Jihadist terrorist
organizations.
Breivik is routinely referred to as an “anti-
Islamist”, especially among those who do
not like such people. It is clear, however,
based on both his manifesto and his com-
ments from the trial, that Breivik harbors
great admiration for Islamic Jihadist terrorists
such as the terror network Al Qaeda, which
he sees as a role model for his violence.
Considering that the Islamic Jihadist terrorists
find inspiration for their actions in Islamic reli-
gious texts such as the Koran, one might
argue that one of Breivik’s indirect sources of
inspiration for his violent acts was the Koran.
(.....)
What is your general impression of the
manifesto?
Breivik’s so-called manifesto can only be de-
scribed as utter rubbish. There are certain
texts within it which seen in isolation appear
as logically coherent, but that is purely due
to the fact that Breivik himself didn’t write
them. Generally speaking, it’s a remarkably
incoherent text, a confused product of a very
confused mind. The compendium is ex-
tremely poorly edited and excessively long.
It is scarcely credible that Breivik supposedly
spent years working on it.
The first part of the manifesto appears re-
asonably coherent, but only because it cites
or reproduces texts from a number of Islam-
critical authors, including Robert Spencer,
Bat Ye’or and Andrew G. Bostom.
The second half is dramatically and at
times shockingly different, with descriptions
of methods for committing mass murder
interspersed with meaningless scribbles
about the Knights Templars, and almost
embarrassingly banal personal details
about what type of music Breivik listens
to on his portable iPod player.
The manifesto includes a list of European
nuclear reactors as potential terrorist targets,
plus meticulous diary notes made by Breivik
in the spring of 2011 on how to make one’s
own bomb.
The compendium claims that the Chernobyl
accident in 1986 was a terrorist attack. It’s un-
clear where this idea originated, since this
theory is fairly uncommon even on the Internet."